The Tribunals Reforms - Ordinance Summary - study of institutions

 



Prepared by

Academic Team of Complete Lawyer


This is in continuation of the study of institutions, the  The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 brings about changes in the jurisdictions of some of the legal legal institutions and therefore the same are notified for reference

 The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 was promulgated on April 4, 2021.  It dissolves certain existing appellate bodies and transfers their functions (such as adjudication of appeals) to other existing judicial bodies (see Table 1)  A Bill with similar provisions was introduced in Lok Sabha on February 13, 2021 and is currently pending.

Table 1 : Transfer of functions of key appellate bodies as proposed under the Ordinance

Acts

Appellate body

Proposed entity

The Cinematograph Act, 1952

Appellate Tribunal

High Court

The Trade Marks Act, 1999

Appellate Board

High Court

The Copyright Act, 1957

Appellate Board

Commercial Court or the Commercial Division of a High Court*

The Customs Act, 1962

Authority for Advance Rulings

High Court

The Patents Act, 1970

Appellate Board

High Court

The Airports Authority of India Act, 1994

Airport Appellate Tribunal

Central government, for disputes arising from the disposal of properties left on airport premises by unauthorised occupants.

High Court, for appeals against orders of an eviction officer.

The Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002

Airport Appellate Tribunal

Civil Court#

The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999

Appellate Board

High Court

Note: * Constituted under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015;

# Refers to a Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district, and includes the High Court in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction.

Sources: The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021; PRS.

 

 

Reference

https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-tribunals-reforms-rationalisation-and-conditions-of-service-ordinance-2021

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“Project Complete Lawyer – Inviting Applications”

Image
The Academic Team  Project Complete Lawyer             Complete Lawyer is an auspicious program jointly organized by Cochin Institute of International Arbitration (CIIArb) and Law and Justice Research Foundation (LJRF) as a tribute to Late (Prof) Dr N R Madhava Menon. The country honored with a Padma Bhushan posthumously.           The concept underlying the project was developed from the vision of Prof Menon, discussed in a speech [1] rendered by him on 25 th June 2016 in the Kerala Bar Council Auditorium Ernakulam, organized by a start-up law firm.   In short, the concept focuses on reducing the incubation period of a law students’ transformation into a professional.   It could be achieved only through intensive training and by providing opportunities to demonstrate the trained skills of the budding lawyers.           Project Complete Lawyer, therefore has two components (1) clinical training on the various skills of legal practice and a study of the legal institutions; and
Read more

Institutional Arbitration - Singapore International Arbitration Centre SIAC - An overview

Image
   Prepared by the  Academic Team of 'Complete Lawyer' The term ‘Institutional Arbitration’ is not defined in the arbitration law [1] , however it is used at least in a few places.   The term ‘institution’ has fifteen, an ‘arbitral institution’ has two and ‘permanent arbitral institution has one reference [2] , these statistics have been true before 9th August 2019 [3] . The term Arbitration has an inclusive definition, which would take in an arbitration administered by a permanent arbitral institution [4] .   The role of an arbitral institution is to arrange administrative assistance for the conduct of arbitral proceedings [5] .   An arbitral institution designated by the High Court or the Supreme Court, alone is considered as an arbitral institution [6] The fees for administrative assistance paid to an arbitral institution, is recoverable as cost of arbitration [7] Ad Hoc arbitration Ad hoc arbitration refers to an arbitration conducted without the assistance of an
Read more